When Wealth Stops Circulating
It seems ironic that the one product humanity almost universally now believes it cannot survive without — money — is the only “resource” that must be translated into the actual life force before it means anything at all.
Money is not food.
It is not water.
It is not shelter.
It is not safety.
It simply represents a future claim on “guaranteed” access to these things.
Yet a future claim is only meaningful if whatever is being claimed still exists.
The more money we produce in a system where planetary resources are already owned, gated, and inherited, the more intensely we compete for access to what was once freely available — air, land, water, community, belonging.
No newborn enters this world with automatic access anymore.
They enter needing permission.
Permission, now priced, with the cost for being human now rising higher every day.
I do not seek to blame the wealthy for succeeding as the system taught them to.
Elites have been role-conditioned, just like everyone else.
They too respond to incentives that reward accumulation over circulation.
But living systems do not thrive on accumulation.
They thrive on flow.
Blood that pools clots.
Water that stagnates putrefies.
Energy that concentrates destabilizes.
When wealth stops circulating and begins hoarding at scale, the entire organism strains to compensate.
The poor feel it as scarcity.
The middle class feels it as anxiety and pressure.
The wealthy often feel it as the fear of loss.
Meanwhile, the planet groans under the extraction required to honor ever-expanding financial claims on its future productivity.
Which begs the sharp, though most often ignored, critical question:
What will extreme wealth buy in a destabilized biosphere?
A second atmosphere?
A private pollination system?
A replacement ocean?
A claim on abundance cannot redeem itself without abundance.
At some point, the measure of success must shift from:
“How much can I accumulate?”
to:
“How much life can I help sustain?”
Money was meant to coordinate exchange.
It was never meant to replace meaning.
Or substitute for trust.
Or outrank the living systems that make all exchanges possible.
The real wealth of a civilization is not counted in billions.
It is counted in breathable air, fertile soil, resilient communities, and children born into access so they can become their greatest version of their grandest inner vision of themselves — not into debt.
If we do not restore circulation,
the organism weakens.
If we do restore it,
prosperity becomes regenerative instead of extractive.
And that shift cannot be redefined as anti-wealth.
For it is actually the most pro-life stance for a human being to take.


been reading griffin recently... and if any of it is true well lets just say an education is continuing. What you detail above has some synchronicities... my question is do you have any reading suggestions on alternatives? I have gotten some glimpse into indigenous Iroquois cultures that seem to support a constructive supportive alternative. Might there be others?
Although, as all of the recorded history I have found (albeit limited), seems to repeat the same EXACT cycle going back to the Hindu and Greeks maybe the point is to just chase the tigers tail?
Excellent ... money of itself is worthless. Money without the abundance of exchange, worthless as well. I do enjoy the way your mind and heart work.